Spectrum Fairness

In response to:Wikipedia and Wikinews

Fri, 16 Oct 2009 06:05:27 +0200

I think it should be noted that "Royce" had been breaking a lot of Wikipedia rules... I looked into everything he mentioned and BlackPearl14 didn't alter his statements (it's in the history, just as he said). Everything is up there. In addition, it seems that BlackPearl14 is a minor, and his continual stalking of her pages has been noted as minor harassment. Hmm.... I think people ought to look at this before they post it up on blogs *rolls eyes*
Nonetheless, it's pretty sad that someone would go so full out about a lawsuit haha

In response to:A Gem of Wikipedia Corruption

Tue, 02 Sep 2008 18:56:21 +0200

Wikipedia and wikinews is absolute corrupt. I have documented double standards and corruption by it's editors and administrators. When I posted a letter of complaint, Blackpearl14 went into my letter deleted portions of it, changing it. They also blocked me. Thus they generate bogus excuse after excuse. They spam google. If you want proof, check out the "history" pages and see how certain pages of even TALK & DISCUSSION are altered or outright deleted by Wikipedia's so-called volunteers. They also have their own business agenda, which I have documented in their own history, yet they accuse me of going into their own bios (which is impossible to do) and creating it. Wikinews also deleted a story about this "Wikipedia Corrupt" from their site within 5 minutes. Also editors/administrators go back and forth. I will be happy to provide photos "screen shots" of their corruption, double standards and reckless abuse. The full letter was placed in TALK / Discussion yet it was either repeatedly deleted or as now has been edited by Blackpearl14, who deleted various portions of it especially involving her corruption and bias (check the history). Then I was blocked, banned etc...

Here is a portion of my letter (A full copy is available upon request)

- Attn: Wikipedia community & Mr. Wales - Through certain editors & administrators, Wikipedia continues to uphold double standards including to not follow it's own policy of communications over issues. Thus the editors/administrators have total control, with a set of ever changing policies and double standards, including deleting anything that challenges their abuse of power and their own violations of wikipedia's written policies. This site continues to solicit itself as a free public forum that anyone can contribute and anyone can communicate as detailed by wikipedia's own written policies. Yet based on the continuing actions of particular editors and administrators, they have made wikipedia their own private forum and have taken away all of those things. Meanwhile Wikipedia is generating hits, ranking status, income and clout from their various statements, and thus wikipedia is committing at the very least fraud upon the public with it's continuous promotions, solicitations and statements.

Other editors and administrators who have proven their practice of bias and manipulative and outright double standards practices include “SVTCobra” and “Whoville” and “Chris Mann”. We have documented that they say one thing, yet practice another. We have documented that they enforce one set of wikipedia polices yet discard and ignore those same policies when it applies to themselves or their selective circle of peers. We contributing writers also wonder just how many editors and administrators have a conflict of interest to various articles.

Here is a collection, from 2007 through August 2008, of some of BLACKPEARL14 (uses various alias wikipedia names) self published bias quotes. She has outright stated her bias purpose, her own bias causes and her own bias business. “I am Pirate Lord-ess of the Caribbean Sea along with my mate Jack Sparrow.” “I am the first Pirates of the Caribbean fan in the universe.” “I manage and contribute to my obsession Pirates of the Caribbean.” (Lists many pirates of the caribbean articles in wikipedia) “I am working my way into managing all Pirates of the Caribbean articles in the future that I can.” “I am the biggest Pirates of the Caribbean fan of all time!” “I have proof of it as well.” “I’m writing a book”. “I’m also a Pirates of the Caribbean consultant, if you have any questions, I own Bring me that Horizon forum.” “I am a big fan of Johnny Depp” “I am a big fan of Pirates of the Caribbean movies”. I have a “Pirates of the Caribbean obsession page - I’d advise you to keep your hat on and not vandalize the pages or you won’t be happy. Seriously.” “I am principal contributor of Pirates of the Caribbean articles.” “My knowledge on pirates spans from my favorite films Pirates of the Caribbean 1-3. Hence I am a Pirates of the Caribbean consultant.” “My Harry Potter obsession pages...” and much more.

Meanwhile like Blackpearl14, Whoville and SVTCobra both continue to delete any critical fact or information, stating that it doesn’t meet their requirements, claiming it’s not newsworthy, not being current, or some other bogus excuse. But these reasons are actually double standards, because other information in the same article which does not meet those always changing requirements are allowed. Even if your contribution is neutral and has been in the news, both Whoville and SVTCobra will generate yet another reason to delete it. Yet they don’t delete other critical facts or information using the same standards. Instead those are allowed. Hence Whoville and SVTCobra continue to apply double standards. When challenged, they bring in their peer who immediately deletes, and bans IP addresses etc..

In response to:more David Cunningham anger with the Labour Party

Sat, 07 Jun 2008 18:50:45 +0200

Several species of sturgeons are harvested for their roe, which is made into caviar - a luxury good which makes some sturgeons pound for pound the most valuable of all harvested fish.voip phone service

In response to:Aspies For Freedom

Mon, 19 May 2008 13:35:21 +0200

Dear Tom and Friends, PLease spread the word as much as possible not just for the people with Asergians syndrome (yes i fondly remember how that name once shined but became a great regret. Want to know it's me? Iguale los sujetos sus pronombres y los verbos apriados spanish for match the appropriate pronouns with their matching verbs. Or Buna Ziua Dragostea Mea "how are you doing" in Portugese. Spanish "bonastias coma estas" I've beem saying my prayers each night for those two pretty angels in the sky Debbie and Pam Peterson and the ex of all ex's Jeryy and then there was the Jerry from video view on maple and my families. SO yes it is me GDG nothing much else to see signed, me.

In response to:Aspies For Freedom

Mon, 19 May 2008 13:28:47 +0200

You know i just move out recently and i had this stupid neighboer hooping and hollering and yelling the word Gay this gay that and the guy never stopped. Once he heard it going across, the radio, the tv the internet he felt he had done justice. I at once call for justitice: FOR THE SAKE OF ALL HUMANIT TO CLEANSE THE EARTH OF ALL THINGS WICKED, EVIL AND WRONG BAN HIM, BAN HIS INCESSANT LIES AND DECIETFUL THINGS, BAN EVEYRTHING THAT EVER HAS TO DO WITH HOMOSEXUALITY GODBLESS, AMEN.THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO SHOULD KNOW ABOUT IT ARE GOD AND THE HEVEANS ABOVE THAT ISSSSSSSSSSSS ALLLLLLLLLLLLLLL CAPISCHE CAPHISCHE. I FEEL SO MUCH BETTER AFTER CLEANSING AND BEING CLEANSED DO YOU ALL. THAT SURE CLEARS UP EVERYTHING AGREED? LETS FIGHT ON ASPIES.LETS STEP UP NO STOP AND STOOP LOW LIKE THOSE FELLOW UNCORPORATE PEOPLE GODBLESS YOU ALL I COULD GIVE YOU ALL ONE BIG GROUP HUG {{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{TOM AND GANG}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}} SIGNED,
GREG

In response to:more David Cunningham anger with the Labour Party

Thu, 08 May 2008 08:16:03 +0200

Cunningham would eventually enjoy a good relationship with the king, but his association with Regent Morton initially made him suspect.

In response to:A Gem of Wikipedia Corruption

Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:37:26 +0100

Find out about term life insurance and compare life insurance quotes. Get the facts and your questions about term life insurance answered. term life insurance quotes term life insurance life insurance quotes

In response to:A Gem of Wikipedia Corruption

Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:37:10 +0100

In response to:David Cunningham: Gordon Brown's Constituency - NHS Fife Break Health and Safety Legislation To Maximise Systematic Abuse

Wed, 14 Nov 2007 06:18:46 +0100

Yes, it's a U.S. law. Here's the Wikipedia link with a special section for Section 230: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Decency_Act

In response to:A Gem of Wikipedia Corruption

Wed, 25 Jul 2007 07:06:35 +0200

good site!!! i want to give you same other sitesDVR Card DVR System PCB抄板,PCB设计 online casinos casinos online thanks k8q4k4yc

In response to:Adders again

Tue, 17 Jul 2007 23:49:19 +0200

The way I see it, Confused 123 (sorry, "Annoyed"), is that as you were the person who started off the most recent trouble on adders, you have specific reasons for backing the admin team. After all, you were the one who so supportively responded with ‘what a waste of time’ when Samantha asked for support in the run-up to her Tribunal for her child.

In a time of great stress and anguish, you were the one who responded so helpfully with ‘what a waste of time’ (surely a breaking in itself of the rules of the site?). How caring of you. Just what she needed at that time, when fighting for appropriate provision for her child (which, incidentally, she got, so the Tribunal clearly did not feel that it was a ‘waste of time’.)

How weird then that you should come on here to back up admin, who strangely did not ban you (perhaps because some of admin agreed with you???). Of course you think it’s a great site – you can bully and bitch at whoever you like and make them feel small and crappy and yet you remain and they have left. You are in that mentality because it suits YOU!

How sad that people like Darky and Bimbo, people who have always given a lot of support, care and help to people on adders, should have felt they had to leave because of the unsupportive nastiness that you started with your comment ‘what a waste of time’. How sad that Samantha does not post anymore. And yet, how completely understandable when they, and many who feel as they do, realise ‘what a waste of time’ adders is at times if you go on there looking to express how you feel or need support when people like you are around.

In response to:David Cunningham: Gordon Brown's Constituency - NHS Fife Break Health and Safety Legislation To Maximise Systematic Abuse

Mon, 16 Jul 2007 19:05:35 +0200

The ferocity is simply against lawyers. I would expect most folks in the world to agree with that. and whichever country's jurisdiction was being cited suits me as long as it applies to all blogs on the one web.

In response to:David Cunningham: Gordon Brown's Constituency - NHS Fife Break Health and Safety Legislation To Maximise Systematic Abuse

Sun, 15 Jul 2007 19:40:18 +0200

Oh dear! You are very sceptical arent you. Sorry to have bothered you with what I thought was a very simple question.

Actually, just for the record, I don't think this Law does actually exist (well not in UK anyway).

I am quite amazed by the ferocity of your reply to be honest .. but, never mind, I only came here to ask one simple questopn and you have answered it.
Thanks again

DD

In response to:David Cunningham: Gordon Brown's Constituency - NHS Fife Break Health and Safety Legislation To Maximise Systematic Abuse

Sun, 15 Jul 2007 17:14:50 +0200

Seems very justified to have read you as tyring to prove the law doesn't exist. That's how it sounded. Define "reputable legal resources". I'm sceptical there are any, when it's common knowledge solicitors and their regulators are corrupt, and the validity of the state itself and the constitution is all wholly undermined by the insistent inaction of Justice Departments/Home Office against the Law Society's claim that solicitors are allowed to change their advice after an event and hold their clients responsible not to have accepted their earlier advice when it was given! Because and as long as this is the case, I put it to you that no such thing as a reputable legal source exists.

In response to:David Cunningham: Gordon Brown's Constituency - NHS Fife Break Health and Safety Legislation To Maximise Systematic Abuse

Sun, 15 Jul 2007 10:28:30 +0200

" Why should I count you as an expert source on a law's non-existence just because you say you can't find a lot of write-ups on it?"

I am not any kind of "expert source" nor have I claimed to be. It isn't that I cant find "a lot of write-ups" on it - I cant find a single reference to it anywhere within reputable legal resources(and I do not mean on Google or Wikipedia etc)

I think you have misinterpreted my query. I am not being critical of you at all. Do you have a contact at Blogspot I could then, perhaps ask my question directly to them.

You have quoted your source to me, thank you. There was no "catch" in my original query I assure you. I just happen to be one of those very sad people who finds legal issues extremely interesting.

Thank you for your time.

DD

In response to:David Cunningham: Gordon Brown's Constituency - NHS Fife Break Health and Safety Legislation To Maximise Systematic Abuse

Sun, 15 Jul 2007 09:58:23 +0200

When Gmail began and many voices were raving over it, it sounded to me like the spam filter might be too strong to trust. I flatly rejected having a Gmail address when a computer-savvy friend pushed me to get one. It is a violation of the user when an arrogant spam filter is in place taking all the decisions, it can easily ruin your life by rejecting an important genuine messaage. It's absurd for anyone to tolerate that. AOL has even been fighting a domain war with Lycos and Tiscali to frustrate folks from using them, that consisted of rejecting as spam utterly every email sent from them.

Yahoo's system is the best I have seen. It is a bit too strong, it sends quite a few genuine messages into your "bulk" folder, but the key point is - you can still read them and get them back out of there. You can even report them as "not spam". The bulk folder fills up with spam that is still there for you to read until you choose to empty it. That is a vital democratic right. I always deem it important to devote several minutes to going through my spam and looking at every mail there is any doubt about before deleting anything.

Laws, generally in life, are cited with their own long titles acting as their reference. There aren't holy experts in Oxford from where you cite a law's existence, when have you ever seen a law referred to in an official notice followed by "from this-and-that source we hold this law exists" ? Blogspot has been my source on this one so is responsible to all blog users for the law's existence, it is healthy from users' point of view to have a blog company standing thus accountable. Why should I count you as an expert source on a law's non-existence just because you say you can't find a lot of write-ups on it?

In response to:Adders again

Sat, 14 Jul 2007 21:27:56 +0200

And so it continues. One rule for them, one rule for others. No apologies, no conceding that they might be wrong, just deny, defend, insult, deny, defend, insult. Nice to see so much interest, like that thing about no publicity being bad publicity, maybe all this fuss might make Caroline et. al. think about how they run the site?

Oooh, just saw a beautiful pig flying past my window...

In response to:Adders again

Sat, 14 Jul 2007 14:07:31 +0200

yeah the two most recent posts under my name arent mine, the ones with the smileys because i dont use them either but trust me i am not an imposter adrian. some people are messin about postin under other peoples names but i am no imposter your just annoyed because you dont know who i am.

In response to:Adders again

Sat, 14 Jul 2007 10:10:39 +0200

i am sorry the person posting under adders admin team is NOT from the adders admin team it is a imposter just like most of the people posting against adders.org

In response to:David Cunningham: Gordon Brown's Constituency - NHS Fife Break Health and Safety Legislation To Maximise Systematic Abuse

Sat, 14 Jul 2007 08:15:14 +0200

Oh Im so sorry, the message went into spam and I didnt see it. So did this Blogspot cite their source to you because, as I said, I am having great difficulty in locating that particular Act?

DD

In response to:David Cunningham: Gordon Brown's Constituency - NHS Fife Break Health and Safety Legislation To Maximise Systematic Abuse

Fri, 13 Jul 2007 20:32:12 +0200

For the record, your email address shows in the system when you post a comment, and I emailed you Wednesday night. Did you have a problem with responding? Anyway: the law info was given by Blogspot, the company hosting a blog by Paul McGee who at the time was a supporter of Aspies For Freedom and very hostile to SF, not wanting to believe what others said they had suffered from AFF. He wrote the comments about "big brother is watching you" that are strewn around SF. It was excellent to get info from his blog host, at the time of SF's site crisis, to turn to SF's own defence. McGee has shut up since sharing the experience of coming into conflict with AFF's dictator-leaders in his own turn. I'm content to leave him to quiet reflection that everything SF was warning about AFF was right after all.

In response to:Adders again

Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:20:16 +0200

Make Love, Not War :D

We Are Family, I Got All My Sisters With Me

BREAK IT DOWN NOW.....

WE

ARE

FAAMMILY

YEAH...ALLLRIIGGHT THATS WHAT IM TALKING BOT :D

In response to:Adders again

Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:15:01 +0200

In response to:Adders again

Fri, 13 Jul 2007 11:06:16 +0200

Ha! Ha! you people will believe just about anything that you really want to be true wont you?

In response to:Adders again

Thu, 12 Jul 2007 22:08:45 +0200

thats the admin team we know and love. sums it all up really.thats why there is such a problem on the site.sayin no more because youve said it for me

In response to:Adders again

Thu, 12 Jul 2007 21:24:19 +0200

Do you know what? DEAL with it! WE have the responsibility and the power NOT you! WE are in charge, NOT you! That's why we have privileges like our own pictures, which was yet another thing for people to whinge about (admin have it, why can't we? Wahwahwah).

You don't like it? Don't go on the site.

In response to:David Cunningham: Gordon Brown's Constituency - NHS Fife Break Health and Safety Legislation To Maximise Systematic Abuse

Thu, 12 Jul 2007 20:45:09 +0200

As a person who has a specific interest in the Law, I would be very grateful if you could signpost me to your source for the Act you quote above : " Section 203(c) Communications Decency Act"

I have been unable to locate this Act in UK Law resources and, from my research, it appears that this Act doesnt not exisit in the UK.

Is this US legislation? I would be very grateful if you could let me know.

Thank you very much for your time.
DD

In response to:David Cunningham: Gordon Brown's Constituency - NHS Fife Break Health and Safety Legislation To Maximise Systematic Abuse

Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:26:49 +0200

Oh sorry, I cant email - you havent included an email address in your introduction? Should I ask it here then, it isnt a complaint or a discussion item and it doesnt relate to any of the current stories here - it's really just a query.
DD

In response to:David Cunningham: Gordon Brown's Constituency - NHS Fife Break Health and Safety Legislation To Maximise Systematic Abuse

Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:22:38 +0200

Im not wanting to contribute to any of the stories on here. Just wanted to ask you a question about your Site.
Thankyou will email.
DD

In response to:Adders again

Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:10:36 +0200

It's part of "the mission statement and ethos" of SF that anyone on either side of this with a case that they are being unfairly treated has a right to post it in reply to what someone else has said. That is happening, on both sides, in this stream of comments. So who do you see being treated "contrary to the mission statement and ethos"? SF is not a mediation site, but nor is it opposed to anyone arguing in favour of mediation. :)